Plattsmouth Board of Education discusses conduct code changes

By Brent Hardin
Thursday, May 14, 2009 - 09:44:31 am CDT

PLATTSMOUTH - Plattsmouth Board of Education members approved the first reading of a motion Monday night that would increase enforcement of the district's Good Conduct Code regarding all extracurricular activities to 12 months.

Board members wanted to change the policy from its current in-season format to one that would cover a longer period of time. Several board members favored a system that would enforce the policy during the school year while others favored adjusting it to a year-round system.

The new 12-month policy would cover all Plattsmouth extracurricular activities at both the middle school and high school.

"It could be a pretty big mind shift for the community, at least from the feedback I've received, to go from the in-season policy we have now to a 12-month system," Plattsmouth superintendent Dr. Richard Hasty told board members. "I've lived with a 12-month system in another state though, and it worked fine then. There might be some community concerns with going 12 months, but I believe it's doable. I would fully support 12 months just as I would a system that goes during the school year."

Several board members favored a 12-month policy because it would include a self-report system. If a student violates the Good Conduct Code and reports the violation within 24 hours, then he or she would receive a reduced punishment. Punishments would be more severe if the student does not report the violation and school officials find out about the incident later on.

Students would receive two such self-report chances during their four years of high school. Omaha Westside and Elkhorn both have similar self-report systems built into their good conduct policies.

"I was conflicted on whether to increase it to nine months or 12 months, but by doing it this way and having a self-report system it gives kids an opportunity to learn from their mistakes while also being held accountable," board member Ken Winters said. "It's important for them to learn that it's important to do it right year round. You don't get a three-month pass."

The policy would also close a loophole that would have allowed students to go out for one school-sponsored activity in order to avoid suspensions in another school activity. For example, a student might try to go out for a spring activity just to serve suspension time so they would not miss any time in a fall activity. The new policy would require students to complete those seasons in good standing in order to meet all punishment terms. If students did not complete the spring activity, then the suspension would carry over into the fall season.

Monday's first reading does not mean the policy has been officially changed yet.  The Board of Education will hear a final reading of the motion at its June meeting. The policy will be changed if the group approves the final reading.

"If nothing else, this could generate some public interest and we could hear some feedback from the community at the next meeting," Hasty said. "This is an important topic that we're discussing."

Leave a Comment

All posts are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.
(optional)
   
Concered Parent
May 14, 2009 10:09 AM
While I do beleive in the Good Conduct Code I do not think it should go to 12 months. The code should cover the school year ontl which is about 15 Aug - 20 May, I also think the school board is taking the easy way out and going to an all year around. The kids should only have to worry about school activites during the school year because they have to worry about the law all year. The school it punishing the kids twice for something they did and that is not right, there is no reason the kids need to learn a lesson twice. It is time for change on the school board and time to get some young thinkers on the board and to get with the times.
Just a reader
May 14, 2009 10:17 AM
Why does there have to be a Good Conduct code? Why not just not allow kids who choose to misbehave to be involved in extracurricular activities. I believe that these activities are a privilage and not a right.

I am confused how we ,the parents, were raised without having to sign these, but are allowing the school system to dictate to us how we're are supposed to raise our children.

When something happens that does not relate to the school ie... on school grounds or at a school sponsered event , why does it become their responsibility? Are we that bad at taking care of our children that we have given control to the school to raise them?
Another Concerened Parent
May 14, 2009 10:25 AM
I guess the school board thinks we must suck as parents and can not raise our kids. The board is trying to make the policy more severe when what they what to punish these kids for they did when they were kids but did not get caught because there were no camera phones back in the day.
Another Concerned Parent
May 14, 2009 10:26 AM
I guess the school board thinks we must suck as parents and can not raise our kids. The board is trying to make the policy more severe when what they what to punish these kids for they did when they were kids but did not get caught because there were no camera phones back in the day.
Concerned Citizen
May 15, 2009 6:56 AM
The first three posts are a perfect example of why schools need 12 month policies like this one.

Too many parents today excuse (and even endorse) their childs misbehavior instead of holding their child to a higher standard. Most conduct policies simply require students to obey existing laws against alcohol, tobacco, and drugs in addition to passing their classes and attending school regularly. This is not too much to ask of our young people and parents should expect no less from their children.

School activities are a privilege. They are not a right and if your child cannot abide by the schools conduct policy they should expect to suffer the consequences of that decision.

Parents - lay down the law with your children and expect them to rise to the challenge. Accept no less. Your child will thank you when he or she is an adult.
Another concerned parent
May 15, 2009 10:34 PM
All I think anybody is trying to say is let the kids be kids sometime. And the statemnt that the above three are a perfect example of why we need the 12 month was down right stupid.The kids have to deal with the law 12 months out of the year and do not need the school on thier backs for 12 months also. Maybe if the school put more time into to teaching the kids they would not be in any trouble. I relly think that Concerned Citizen does not even have any kids. He or she should realize that it does not even matter because there are some kids in town who get away with what ever they do because of thier name. All kids are not treated the same by the school and you can tell by some of the punishments that have come down. All they need to do is make it from the first day of school to the last and let the parents and the police take care of the other months. And if Concerned Citizen wants he/she could have my kids for a few weeks to see that it is not easy being a parent in these times which are a lot different then when Concerned Citizen was in school doing just what the kids today are doing but just did not get caught. That is all I have to say other then I have lived here all my life and might just move because of all the back woods thinking in this town.
A Grandparent
May 18, 2009 10:03 AM
I'm all for it, 12 month conduct code. Too many children are raised in disfunctional homes today, someone needs to guide them in the right direction. "Bullying" should be included in this code, far to much of this going on and it can cause a child to turn to drastic measures when they are the object of the "affliction".
Concerned Citizen
May 18, 2009 6:57 PM
Another, you are correct in stating that I don't currently have a high school aged student. That does not change my point. It is NEVER be acceptable for a minor to break the law (or school policy) with regards to alcohol, tobacco, and drugs.

I repeat, it is NEVER ACCEPTABLE!

Kids can be kids without the use of illegal substances. Responsible parents understand this and set appropriate rules and limits.

Unfortunately, there are too many irresponsible parents and so the schools are put in the position of creating and enforcing the rules parents should but won't (or don't have the guts) to enforce.

It is not your job as a parent to be your kids friend or buddy. You job (and mine) is to teach them to be caring, responsible, thoughtful, and productive members of our community. Conduct codes are one tool that schools use to teach these lessons. Just because you won't take the time to teach these lessons to your children doesn't mean the school should ignore them too.
Just another reader
May 20, 2009 12:10 PM
Apparently you feel that it is best if we let others be responsible for our kids in your including of me in your first response. Did you even bother to read what I wrote? You condem me with the other two, but then turn around and say exactly what I said.

To that I say I will raise my children they way I see fit. I do not live in a socialist society were I rely on the government to tell me what to do or how to think. There are standards that I hold my kids to that are more restrictive than the school's.

The rules concerning drugs, alcohol and tobacco should be enforced no matter what the age.

Point being, If you don't know me or the rules my kids live by then don't you dare tell me that I don't know how to raise my kids.

Your job is to take care of your kids and mine is to take care of my kids, it is not the school responsibilty.
Concerned Citizen
May 21, 2009 4:24 PM
Reader, it was your second sentence "Why not just not allow kids who choose to misbehave to be involved in extracurricular activities." that led me to believe that you disapproved of the 12 month (or any) conduct code.

Also, your lead sentence in the the third paragraph reads as if you disagree with conduct codes.

I'm glad to be corrected and even happier to learn that you set responsible limits for your children. Kudos. If more parents would recognize their responsibilities schools wouldn't need conduct codes.